Harbin is not practical
I agree that there are no conveient access points to the bike path from Huber Ridge but Harbin is not the answer. We have this slight problem of crossing Alum Creek to get to the path and spending hundreds of thousands of dollars to cross the creek is not a good investment (see the bridge on the 315 path just south of 270 in Worthington).
If we were to make real progress, we should consider having the berms marked with bike lanes on Dempsey and then Hempstead Roads up to Inniswood Metro Park. The park is in the process of developing a bike path over to Sunbury Road.
The other consideration would be to get the township or county to erect bicycle path signs directing cyclists to the entrance of the Alum Creek Path over by the Speedway at Dempsey and install a pedestrian switch at both sides of the intersection to allow cyclists to walk their bikes across Westerville Road.
Both of these options are economically feasible and can be implemented with minimal effort.
By Brent
I agree that there are no conveient access points to the bike path from Huber Ridge but Harbin is not the answer. We have this slight problem of crossing Alum Creek to get to the path and spending hundreds of thousands of dollars to cross the creek is not a good investment (see the bridge on the 315 path just south of 270 in Worthington).
If we were to make real progress, we should consider having the berms marked with bike lanes on Dempsey and then Hempstead Roads up to Inniswood Metro Park. The park is in the process of developing a bike path over to Sunbury Road.
The other consideration would be to get the township or county to erect bicycle path signs directing cyclists to the entrance of the Alum Creek Path over by the Speedway at Dempsey and install a pedestrian switch at both sides of the intersection to allow cyclists to walk their bikes across Westerville Road.
Both of these options are economically feasible and can be implemented with minimal effort.
By Brent